<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gmail shortcomings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowit.co.nz/2007/06/gmail-shortcomings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowit.co.nz/2007/06/gmail-shortcomings</link>
	<description>Tech, Apple and WordPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miraz</title>
		<link>http://knowit.co.nz/2007/06/gmail-shortcomings/comment-page-1#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Miraz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactips.info/blog/?p=2136#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s a good suggestion, and I do have my personal Gmail account working with Eudora.



This particular account is for a client and I actually don&#039;t want the emails themselves or the many many attachments piping down onto my Mac. For this particular account the only way I want to access it is via the web interface.



What&#039;s more I have to use Windows for this client and avoid having Eudora open while I do that work. I can access the Gmail account I need to work with from a web browser on the Mac or under Windows.



My point remains that both stationery and Redirect belong in Gmail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s a good suggestion, and I do have my personal Gmail account working with Eudora.</p>
<p>This particular account is for a client and I actually don&#8217;t want the emails themselves or the many many attachments piping down onto my Mac. For this particular account the only way I want to access it is via the web interface.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more I have to use Windows for this client and avoid having Eudora open while I do that work. I can access the Gmail account I need to work with from a web browser on the Mac or under Windows.</p>
<p>My point remains that both stationery and Redirect belong in Gmail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://knowit.co.nz/2007/06/gmail-shortcomings/comment-page-1#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 06:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactips.info/blog/?p=2136#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Why not just use Eudora to handle your gmail. You can still access the gmail account else where when you lack your computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just use Eudora to handle your gmail. You can still access the gmail account else where when you lack your computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.T.Cook</title>
		<link>http://knowit.co.nz/2007/06/gmail-shortcomings/comment-page-1#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>E.T.Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mactips.info/blog/?p=2136#comment-202</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that the features would be nice...but at what point do you consider a feature superfluous.  Too many times we have kitchen sink syndrome, and want to put every feature that anyone might or could want into a product...it isn&#039;t pragmatic.  It is this reason alone that we have bloated software packages or services that are cited as the catalysts for the &quot;KISS&quot; paradigm that is so popular nowadays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that the features would be nice&#8230;but at what point do you consider a feature superfluous.  Too many times we have kitchen sink syndrome, and want to put every feature that anyone might or could want into a product&#8230;it isn&#8217;t pragmatic.  It is this reason alone that we have bloated software packages or services that are cited as the catalysts for the &#8220;KISS&#8221; paradigm that is so popular nowadays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: knowit.co.nz @ 2012-05-24 20:11:56 -->
