Can we evade the good cause pressgangs?

23 December 2009 · 4 comments

Just because you’re a ‘good cause’ doesn’t mean I want you to solicit me by phone at dinnertime or send a stream of email messages.

 

Oxfam Unwrapped do a fabulous thing:

Oxfam gifts.

Oxfam gifts.

At Oxfam Unwrapped you can give real items that people living in poverty around the world need to change their lives for the better. You’ll receive a card to pass-on and your gift goes to those who need it most.

You ‘buy’ a goat, or a lamb, or a water purifying system, or other goods that will help impoverished people feed themselves or improve their circumstances. They receive the product you buy and you have a good feeling that you’ve done something worthwhile.

I don’t need more ‘stuff’

I like this idea: I definitely don’t need more ‘stuff’, and try to discourage my friends from giving me ‘things’. Billions of people in the world are much worse off than I am and desperately need the real gifts of clean water, chickens, tools for farming, and the like.

Why a phone number?

Today I was organising a gift for a friend through this charity. I chose the gift, selected an electronic card with customised message and moved on to the payment portion of the deal.

That’s where things went a little sour. I’m still undecided about whether or not to complete the transaction.

Phone number required.

Phone number required.

What happened? Well, they required my phone number.

Why?

This is an electronic transaction. I expect to hand over my credit card number and email address at some point. They’ll email the gift card to my friends, and I expect they’ll email me some kind of receipt and confirmation.

They also ask for my street address, but that’s standard practice for a credit card transaction.

Why do they require my phone number? Is it so their fundraisers can ring me at dinner time and ask for donations? I can tell you right now I don’t want them to do that.

What privacy?

Personal data.

Personal data.

Further down the page I have to agree to the Terms and Conditions. On the T&C page they mention (but don’t directly link to) a Privacy Policy. The Privacy Policy link does appear in the footer of every page.

Apparently they’ll use my personal data for the purposes of supplying the goods. OK, that’s fine.

Oh, and I need to see the Privacy Policy.

Under the Privacy Act 1993 any information you supply us with will be held by Oxfam and used to communicate with you about Oxfam’s work.

Ah, so they will ring me at dinner time to tell me about their work and solicit funds. Sounds like they may start mailing me stuff on paper, or by email too.

And look what else they don’t, or is it they do do:

We do not sell or pass our mailing lists on to other organisations.

Occasionally, with everyone’s agreement, we are able to approach supporters of other organisations and they ours. In these situations your privacy is assured because your name and address is not seen by anyone unless you respond to the approach.

If you prefer not to receive these one-off letters however, please tell us that you do not want to be contacted by other organisations.

So, they’re also going to send me ‘letters’ about the work of other organisations.

A one-time supporter

This is not OK. I want to do this one, single, thing. I want to support the work of the charity by giving a gift to a friend. I do not want to sign up to emails, letters and phonecalls about the charity or about what their friends do.

I support what Oxfam do. They do good works and deserve the donations they receive.

But I don’t want to sign up for spam. I really don’t.

Not the only ones

There are many other charitable organisations who also do good works and who also grab my contact details if I get within a mile of them. I’m not just picking on Oxfam. It’s just that they were the organisation I struck today.

Do I grit my teeth, hand over my phone number, separately email them to say: don’t add me to any mailing or calling lists? Or do I just abandon this transaction and try another charity?

They’re being sneaky

This is a bad way to go about things. They’re being sneaky. It’s not straightforward to find the information that they’ll use my contact details for anything beyond this single transaction. The wording about sharing my details with their friends is confusing.

There is a link to the Privacy Policy on every page but they don’t link within the text of the Terms and Conditions. I have to agree to the Terms and Conditions to complete my transaction.

There’s quite a little trail to follow to find that I’m opening myself up to communications I don’t want.

I’d like to see them being much more upfront about all this, and giving me explicit options to sign up for their guff (by default not checked, of course). I don’t want to be ‘captured’ by this or any other charity, however good their motives, however important their cause.

I refuse to be pressganged.

Clip to Evernote

4 comments

Tell us what you think.
Note: there may be a delay before your comment appears. I now approve all comments from new visitors, in an attempt to keep spam at bay.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Maria 23 December 2009 at 13:17 44

This is a fact of life these days. Once they get your personal information, they can use it however it states in the “fine print.” Or however they like if they fail to provide fine print.

I’m still outraged because I posted a comment on another blog and the blogger harvested my e-mail address and sent me spam.

Here in the U.S., we have the “Do Not Call Registry” where you can register your phone number as one that does not want to receive marketing calls. Telemarketers are SUPPOSED to check the list before they make calls. But checking the list costs money and most people don’t bother to complain if they’re called, so few companies check the list.

My husband and I like to play games with telemarketers. My favorite: “Yes, I’m very interested in this. Hold on for a minute while I get on another phone.” I then put the phone down and go about my business while they listen patiently to the ambient noise until they finally get the hint and hang up.

Reply

Violet 24 December 2009 at 00:44 48

I can appreciate your dilemma though I’ve found in the US that they always ask for a phone number as well as adddress in connection with my credit card. IIRC, the Paypal option doesn’t usually ask though.

But enough of that, the reason that I’m adding a comment is to suggest that Heifer International does the same thing as Oxfam. Buy a llama, a goat or a cow, or a knitting basket, etc. We’ve donated to them for the last several years and they’re very unobtrusive.

Happy holidays!

http://www.heifer.org/

Reply

Miraz 24 December 2009 at 07:09 19

Thanks for the reminder Violet.

In fact I did switch to a gift from Heifer. I’ve sent (and received) Heifer gifts before and really like what they do.

Reply

Jon Siegel 24 December 2009 at 10:15 27

There is a terrific alternative that protects your privacy and that of your gift recipient. Please check out TisBest Philanthropy (http://www.TisBest.org), the No. 1 charity gift card (according to TheStreet.com). You purchase the gift card from TisBest. The recipient of the card directs the funds to the charity of their choice. You receive the tax deduction, the recipient receives the pleasure of choosing the charity and knowing your gift goes to a cause important to him. But the charity receives the money, not the private information you discuss in your posting. We believe people want to be private, and that when they want to reveal themselves to a favorite cause, they will do so. The charities on our list appreciate the fact that they’ll be seen by the thousands of people who receive the gift cards. But they are not provided with the contact information of either the gift purchaser or the recipient. Period.
Jon Siegel
Executive Director
TisBest Philanthropy

Reply

Add your Comment

Older Post:

Newer Post: